joel's thoughts

The UK Telegraph has Part 2 of Christopher Monckton’s take on global warming, in which he addresses proposed and potential responses (i.e., “so what do we do now?”).

George Monbiot over at The Guardian has provided an attempted debunking. “Debunking” because he raises several valid points and provides enough information to bring the certainty in Monckton’s piece down a peg or two; “attempted” because it doesn’t seem to provide quite enough to swing one’s certainty the other way, and smacks a bit of the “you unwashed masses couldn’t be expected to understand” bearing which rarely elevate’s one’s cause in the eyes of the intended audience.